
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/376272_cancer25.html
Breast-feeding may cut risk of aggressive cancer
Fred Hutchinson study finds lower rate of 'triple negative' tumors for women who nurse
Last updated August 24, 2008 10:42 p.m. PT
By TOM PAULSON
P-I REPORTER
Science has proved that mothers and babies benefit from
breast-feeding in all sorts of ways, and now researchers at the Fred
Hutchinson Cancer Research Center have shown that this practice can
reduce the risk of a particularly aggressive form of breast cancer.
"It's a form more common among younger women and African-American
women," said Amanda Phipps, a scientist in the public health division
of the Seattle cancer center and lead author of a report published
Monday in the journal Cancer. "We wanted to find out what puts women at
risk for this."
The aggressive cancer type is called "triple negative" breast cancer
because the tumor doesn't respond to a critical regulatory protein
known as "HER2" or two key hormones, estrogen and progestin, which also
are fundamental to many hormone-based treatments for breast cancer.
"That's why we can't use hormonal treatments on these tumors," Phipps said.
Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive cancer estimated to
be involved in anywhere from 15 percent to 30 percent of all breast
cancers, she said. Little is known about why some women are at higher
risk of developing this form of cancer.
Phipps and her colleagues at Fred Hutchinson examined two groups of
women from 55 to 79 years old with and without a diagnosis of breast
cancer. They compared 1,476 women without the cancer with 1,140 women
with several different forms of breast cancer including the "triple
negative," the most common "luminal" form and another subtype
associated only with the HER2 protein.
The researchers then examined these women with respect to their
reproductive health histories including breast-feeding practices, onset
of menstruation and menopause. All of these, Phipps said, provide
indicators of the hormone levels over time for these women.
"We've known for a long time that breast-feeding reduces your risk
of breast cancer, and that it was probably related to hormones," she
said. But there has been little specific research, she said, on which
hormones might affect the risk of these more aggressive forms of breast
cancer.
By comparing the molecular nature of these breast cancer types with
each woman's reproductive history, Phipps and her colleagues found that
breast-feeding for at least six months corresponded with a lower risk
of both the common luminal form as well as the triple-negative form of
breast cancer. They also found that early onset of menstruation (before
age 13) was associated with a higher risk of the HER2 breast cancer.
Late onset of menopause and the use of hormone treatments were found
to increase the risk of luminal breast cancer. They found no risk
differences associated with the number of children or the mother's age
at first birth.
While it is common knowledge that female hormone levels change with
the onset of menstruation or menopause, and so may be related to
hormonally influenced cancer risks, it is not fully understood why
breast-feeding would be correlated with this cancer-hormone link.
"One possible explanation is that while women are breast-feeding,
they aren't menstruating and so their hormones aren't cycling," Phipps
said.
So the more women breast-feed, she said, the less chance their
hormones may have to trigger a cancer. Another theory, she said, is
that breast-feeding alters breast cell structures in ways that make
them less prone to develop into cancer cells.
The findings support the overall view that breast-feeding can reduce
a woman's risk of cancer, Phipps said. More importantly for scientists,
she said, it shows that different reproductive health behaviors have
different effects on various forms of breast cancer.
"It helps explain why some women are at higher risk and also why
certain therapies are not effective against these more aggressive forms
of breast cancer," she said.